In my previous blog we arrived at a ratio (Total no. of medals won at the Asian Games) / (Total no. of medals won at Olympics) which correlated the performance of the Asian games with the Olympics that occurred in the same four year cycle. We did find out that India's ratio of 17.83 was at the bottom of the list (remember a lower ratio points to a greater ability to reproduce one's Asian Games performance on the Olympic stage) when we considered the top ranking nations at Asian Games. But one question remained unanswered, was this the greatest disparity between Asian Games and Olympics as far as India was concerned? I dove straight into the medal tallies from the previous century to dig up the answer to my question. The graph brought about several interesting observations: Until 2008 Olympics, India's performance at the 1952 Helsinki games (with 2 medals) was its best ever. Sadly, India delivered what would be its finest medal tally (unt...
From the pinnacle of Asian Games, Olympics was a steep fall for India. That set me thinking as to how many more countries found the going tough on the world stage after excelling at the Asian games. For my initial analysis, I took the top 15 countries at Asian Games and mapped out their corresponding ranking at Olympics. As expected, India's Olympic ranking of 71 was third worst behind Malaysia and Qatar. But rankings are not always a great measure to assess how well a country did at a multisport event where a country with a single gold medal outranks another with multiple medals on the account of that country not winning a gold medal. So, in order to have an equitable comparison, I mapped out the number of medals each country won at the Olympics and Asian Games side by side. This time India narrowly avoided the lower third of the graph which contained countries such as Hong Kong, Indonesia and Bahrain that were placed higher over India in the Olympic rankings. Like rankin...